3 ms·
I'm thinking of going down that route, but for various reasons I NEED Outlook and Office a lot, although my main work is development and could work on another p
by darklajid 7y ago
I'm thinking of going down that route, but for various reasons I NEED Outlook and Office a lot, although my main work is development and could work on another platform.
If you do this (as I did in the past) you're now juggling N Windows VMs to avoid ONE Windows host system..
- viraptor 7y agoWhy N VMs? You had one before, you can have one VM with multiple apps (if you can even count office parts as multiple apps)
- darklajid 7y agoSorry, kinda mixed the "Need office" requirement I wrote about and my previous "Different VMs for different needs" (Office was one, a Windows product I build extensions for was in another, then the corporate environment tends to keep VMware images around to simulate a customer environment / to prepare a demo system for sales etc etc). You're right. One VM could work for office and other utilities. Unfortunately for me it grew into a mess of VMs, fast.
- fnenrjfkdke 7y agoI think Qubes OS targets your use case. It has support for Windows 7 although I never got around to trying it out.
- snagglegaggle 7y agoIf you can set up stuff in Windows VM, you can enable RemoteApp and freerdp can just show a seamless window. Kind of like parallels.
- CRConrad 7y agoHow about the Office / Outlook Web interfaces, shouldn't they be usable from any OS?
- mastazi 7y agoThey don’t handle well some edge cases, for example I had Word documents with complex layouts that would be broken and partially unreadable when using the web version of Word.