The media lynch is documented here: https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ Stallman wrote: the most plausible scenario

The media lynch is documented here: https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ Stallman wrote: the most plausible scenario is that she presented herself to him as entirely willing. The Daily Beast re-contextualizes this as that she was, not presented as, willing. And the title includes "defended Epstein" and "victims", plural, both of which are entirely fabricated, and not reflected in Stallman's writings. In short, The Daily Beast is lying to you, and half a month later has not bothered to clarify or correct their article. You should assume anything else they print is utterly unconcerned with the truth, and spun however they like. I can't begin to put my contempt for them into words.