"I've said this before, but you can't outlaw the maths." I don't think this is the right analogy - instead, I think a better statement would be "you can't outl

"I've said this before, but you can't outlaw the maths." I don't think this is the right analogy - instead, I think a better statement would be "you can't outlaw random numbers". A random number and the ciphertext output of a secure encryption algorithm should be indistinguishable. I don't think I am being naive to think that even in our wildest dystopian nightmares there is no real path from (current jurisprudence in five-eyes jurisdictions) to (random numbers being illegal).