3 ms·
> You don't need socialism to have universal healthcare. What I'm saying is that many, many people on both sides of the issue use "socialism" to mean "any soci
by PhasmaFelis 7y ago
> You don't need socialism to have universal healthcare.
What I'm saying is that many, many people on both sides of the issue use "socialism" to mean "any socialist policy regardless of the majority economic or governmental system." That's not what Marx intended, and it may not be what it means in the former USSR, but that's usually what it means in English. When someone says "we need more socialism" or mocks the idea that "socialism will destroy America", then barring additional context, it's not helpful to assume they want a full Soviet system.
- m0zg 7y agoWhat I'm saying is "what Marx intended" is utterly idiotic and destructive, and fundamentally at odds with human nature. It has failed every time it's been tried, it just took longer for it to fail in some cases than in others. Sooner or later you do run out of other people's money.
- PhasmaFelis 7y agoIndeed. I hope nothing I said implied that I disagreed with that.