3 ms·
Not if the lawbreaking is enabled by a loophole, as in this case. Closing the loophole may not be enough, but it should be the first priority.
by hannasanarion 7y ago
Not if the lawbreaking is enabled by a loophole, as in this case. Closing the loophole may not be enough, but it should be the first priority.
- anigbrowl 7y agoIt's important but you need to consider the situation where the government is corrupt. The Us is about to impeach the President; and the two factions in government are each accusing the other of corruption, albeit using wildly different criteria.
- hannasanarion 7y agoSo what? Does the fact that the current adminstration is criminal mean that legal loopholes are meaningless and that closing them helps nothing?
- anigbrowl 7y agoMy point is that laws are only as good as the integrity of the government enforcing them, and can themselves be written in bad faith. The solution is greater participation by the public rather than only technical fixes to the legal code.