Agree. Don't touch definitions. For example, some people were not fine with the definition of "free software", so they coined the term "open source software" to

Agree. Don't touch definitions. For example, some people were not fine with the definition of "free software", so they coined the term "open source software" to line out their views on the topic. I think "social" or "ethical" software could be a reasonable term for the views proposed. That being said, and IANAL, but I'm pretty sure that such ideas would not held in court, unless the "unethical behaviour" is illegal. But in this case, why should criminals stick to software licences?