4 ms·
No way. The vast majority of us want phones that are totally impregnable. I want a phone that not even Apple can access, let alone Steve down at the repair shop
by dev_dull 7y ago
No way. The vast majority of us want phones that are totally impregnable. I want a phone that not even Apple can access, let alone Steve down at the repair shop.
I’m normally all about right-to-repair, but with my phone I want privacy and security.
- guipsp 7y agoThe way androids do it is to wipe the device on root, which sounds reasonable
- saurik 7y agoSince you also want protection from Apple, you actually don't disagree: right now, Apple can put your phone in DFU mode and "upgrade" its software to a new build which gives them not just root access (which isn't terribly useful these days) but complete control over the kernel. (They still can't steal your data unless you help, due to disk encryption, but that's an unrelated topic.) I want a phone where Apple can't do that; but I mean, someone has to be able to do that, as otherwise the software on the phone can't be upgraded. So I want the person in control of that to be me, the owner. If I so choose, I can trust Apple's software. Or I can choose to not trust Apple's software and trust software from you. This concept of software trust eventually comes down to a root certificate (just as it already does), which should be controlled by the same secure enclave as the disk encryption (so the software itself can't alter my trust roots in case of an exploit). There: not only easy to be equivalent to what you have, not only able to give people like me actual control, but more secure than the status quo (as Apple can be locked out), not less.