3 ms·
> They are taking a big risk personally compared to a typical staff member. Negative effect of a failed CEO: $25M in severance pay [1]. Roughly 10-12 times th
by MereInterest 7y ago
> They are taking a big risk personally compared to a typical staff member.
Negative effect of a failed CEO: $25M in severance pay [1]. Roughly 10-12 times the lifetime earnings of a college graduate [2]. When the cost of failure is to have enough income to live very comfortable for the rest of their lives, that is not a large cost.
Negative effect on employees: needing to find a new job, move to a new location, start a new social life, and that is all assuming that there is the recommended 3-6 month emergency fund. When 40% of US adults would be underwater from an unexpected $400 bill [3], this adds debt and uncertainty to be able to start up again.
[1] https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/compensation-issues/healthcare-ceos-see-25m-golden-parachute-on-average-5-things-to-know.html https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/compensation-issues/he...
[2] https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/research-summaries/education-earnings.html https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/research-summaries/education...
[3] https://www.fool.com/retirement/2018/05/23/guess-how-many-americans-couldnt-cover-a-400-emerg.aspx https://www.fool.com/retirement/2018/05/23/guess-how-many-am...
- nvarsj 7y agoI didn't mean financial risk. As a public officer, you are taking risk in terms of your public reputation and legal responsibilities. That does factor into the comp - in fact, it is fairly common in certain highly regulated industries for the CEO's entire role to just to take the burden of liability.
- justinjlynn 7y agoSo, how many banking executives were found criminally liable after, say, the 2008 global financial crisis?
- rjf72 7y agoIn places such as Iceland, where bankers have not 'integrated' so deeply with the government, the banks were allowed to crash and top executives served years in prison. [1] This included people all the way up to chairmen. It had a catastrophic short term impact, but Iceland's economy rapidly recovered and remains healthy to this day. Incidentally their current president has an approval rating upwards of 90%. Obama in 2009 was optically in conflict with bankers. Quoting things such as "I did not run for office to be helping out a bunch of fat cat bankers on Wall Street" [2]. 8 years later, he's getting paid $400k for 30 minute talks by them, repeatedly. For some reason banks and investors don't seem so anxious to turn Icelandic presidents into multimillionaires for a few hours of talking once they leave office. [1] - https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/iceland-to-sentence-ninth-banker-found-guilty-of-market-manipulation-that-helped-cause-2008-a7349711.html https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/iceland-to-s... [2] - https://www.reuters.com/article/us-financial-regulation-obama-idUSTRE5BA4IF20091211 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-financial-regulation-obam...