I'm wondering whether you're also in favor of disallowing journalists to basically create blogspam copies of other, real journalist's, work? Because that actua

I'm wondering whether you're also in favor of disallowing journalists to basically create blogspam copies of other, real journalist's, work? Because that actually hurts the original source. Google providing the first 2 sentences with a link to the article? Not so much. As the Springer case has shown, Google is actually providing a service to the publishers here, who receive considerable less traffic without Google sending users their way.