3 ms·
It's hard to say a hypothetical energy source (commercially-viable fusion) is objectively better than one that actually exists.
by mypalmike 7y ago
It's hard to say a hypothetical energy source (commercially-viable fusion) is objectively better than one that actually exists.
- pmiller2 7y agoA hypothetical, completely clean energy source is objectively better than one that emits greenhouse gasses, on its face.
- LanceH 7y agoI'll counter with a hypothetical way to clean up greenhouse gases using fossil fuels. That is, until something can be put into production, it is not a superior product.
- pmiller2 7y agoOk, let’s add “renewable” to the equation. How do fossil fuels stack up to a clean, renewable source of energy?