3 ms·
I cannot really read the article. It's too depressing because I'm still stuck with C++03. But even before the newer C++ became widespread, I wondered why it la
by jackewiehose 7y ago
I cannot really read the article. It's too depressing because I'm still stuck with C++03.
But even before the newer C++ became widespread, I wondered why it lacks behind C99 in some aspects. And it seems that this hasn't changed much:
> The good news is that C++20 is getting basic designated initialization too, the bad news is that it will only be a very limited subset of the C99 feature
- ncmncm 7y agoThe useful subset, not coincidentally.
- jackewiehose 7y agoWhich subset you wouldn't consider useful?
- ncmncm 7y agoOut-of-order initialization, and multiple initialization, have limited usefulness.