3 ms·
You wouldn't ask for that information in that way. Most places would say because it's faster or why would you use anything else? Not give you any company histo
by wolco 7y ago
You wouldn't ask for that information in that way.
Most places would say because it's faster or why would you use anything else? Not give you any company history.
Ask who makes technical decisions. Or what debt structure they have. Not why they choose aws over azure.
- htfu 7y agoAssuming you're not desperate for work you're interviewing them just as much as they are you. Perfectly valid. And you clearly misunderstood what they meant by technical debt.
- wolco 7y agoYour interviewing them but in this case it was a pointless question asked at the wrong time with no possibility of anything of value coming from it. This place uses php. It's in the job description (either that or the parent had no knowledge of what the company did before the interview) so the discovery should have happened earlier in the process. By asking that question in that way the parent poster is signaling that he is modern but at the same time saying the company isn't modern by phrasing it that way. Wanting to understand how a company makes decisions is valid. Making judgement statements through questions is not valid. And yes misunderstood company for technical debt reference.
- htfu 7y agoNow I get you, completely fair. I think that would mostly come down to tone though.