3 ms·
There are non-trivial compliance costs with maintaining accounts, an inactive account can absolutely be a cost for a financial institution. Not to mention that
by u10 7y ago
There are non-trivial compliance costs with maintaining accounts, an inactive account can absolutely be a cost for a financial institution. Not to mention that the bank makes a spread on deposits, so an inactive account is generating compliance costs + not generating any revenue (not necessarily the fees).
- AnimalMuppet 7y ago> There are non-trivial compliance costs with maintaining accounts, an inactive account can absolutely be a cost for a financial institution. Sure. But in terms of compliance costs, an active account costs just as much, and perhaps more (if there are compliance costs per transaction, not just per account). > Not to mention that the bank makes a spread on deposits They make a spread on money left in the account. But I can leave money in an inactive account, too, and they make just as much money on that.
- vonmoltke 7y agoI have not heard of inactive account fees on accounts with a significant amount held in them. Typically, they charge you for keeping too little in there, sometimes regardless of activity. Edit: I did a little research. Bank of America has no dormant account fee that I can find. SunTrust does[1]... but only for Florida accounts, for some unknown reason. This may be a jurisdictional thing. [1] https://www.suntrust.com/content/dam/suntrust/us/en/personal-banking/2019/documents/fs-retail-english.pdf https://www.suntrust.com/content/dam/suntrust/us/en/personal... (page 6)