2 ms·
If you dig down to the results, San Pellegrino is one of the lowest: https://orbmedia.org/stories/plus-plastic/ https://orbmedia.org/stories/plus-plastic/
by dunham 7y ago
If you dig down to the results, San Pellegrino is one of the lowest:
https://orbmedia.org/stories/plus-plastic/ https://orbmedia.org/stories/plus-plastic/
About halfway down the page. The graphs make it look like they didn't take too many samples per brand though.
- armitron 7y agoI'm wondering which version of San Pellegrino they tested, since it also comes in a glass bottle. It is probable that a significant contamination factor is the plastic bottle itself, which would explain why San Pellegrino is low on the list.
- AJ007 7y agoYou have to look at the equipment used in the processing as well. Whats in your food? No idea. https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/whats-in-your-childs-mac-and-cheese-toxic-chemicals-a-new-study-says/ https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/whats-in-your-chil... On the other side of things, maybe your glass bottled water is microplastic free, but has other serious contaminants. The second largest arsenic bottled water was in glass containers: https://www.consumerreports.org/water-quality/arsenic-in-some-bottled-water-brands-at-unsafe-levels/ https://www.consumerreports.org/water-quality/arsenic-in-som...