3 ms·
Neat, I was thinking about doing just this! One clarification: > Additionally, you need to have a $5/month subscription to Workers, to get access to Workers K
by losvedir 7y ago
Neat, I was thinking about doing just this!
One clarification:
> Additionally, you need to have a $5/month subscription to Workers, to get access to Workers KV. I want us to offer a free tier of KV in the future, but we’re not there yet. That $5/month gets you a lot more than one site, to be clear, but this isn’t a completely free solution today.
Just to be clear, since I misunderstood at first: there is a free tier of Workers (which is absolutely worth trying). It's the KV store that adds cost. I think you are saying that, but it also could be read that Workers by itself costs $5/mo.
But conceivably, you could host your blog on the free tier, right, by compiling the static content into the hosted app?
- steveklabnik 7y agoYes, there's basically two tiers of Workers for self-service: Free, and $5/month. You only get access to KV on the $5/month plan currently. You do get better speed and more CPU time for those workers, but it's strictly speaking KV that requires the $5 here. > But conceivably, you could host your blog on the free tier, right, by compiling the static content into the hosted app? Yes, you could! There's a size limit to a worker though, so for a large site you may not be able to.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- adamschwartz 7y agoTotally! I do that for small sites quite often, e.g.: - https://lazy.invoice.workers.dev https://lazy.invoice.workers.dev - https://web.scraper.workers.dev https://web.scraper.workers.dev Both are powered in part by a worker which generates CSS on the fly for whatever components you need, e.g: https://ui.adam.workers.dev/?components=button,input https://ui.adam.workers.dev/?components=button,input
- judge2020 7y agoLooks good, bookmarked!