3 ms·
> > It's not my fault if she is a nobody (she really is) that builds weapons for the US military (she really does) > What does any of that have to do with what
by zzzcpan 7y ago
> > It's not my fault if she is a nobody (she really is) that builds weapons for the US military (she really does)
> What does any of that have to do with what she said?
Person with questionable morals [1] making moral judgement claims suggests that the whole thing was manufactured. I wouldn't even exclude a possibility that she received some money to publish the things that she did.
[1] as her career choice clearly shows she has no problem with wars, which are known to cause death, including death of children, actual rape of young girls, organ harvesting and pretty much anything awful you can think of in this world wars have
- cptskippy 7y agoShe worked on the guidance systems for an autonomous ground vehicle for the DoD that's basically a proof of concept at this point. We're equating that to war monger?
- lostjohnny 7y ago> war monger war mongers become war mongers one drone at the time.
- curryst 7y agoAs was the atomic bomb at one point in time. There may be exceptions for unintended uses of the technology you develop (a la Alfred Nobel), but there's not a lot of wiggle room when you work for the DoD. You were hired to develop things that will eventually be used to kill people. That's the end goal of the job. Whether you make anything usable or not is somewhat beside the point, the intention is still there.
- mosdl 7y agoHow many people were killed by tech that uses FSF code? Quite a lot I bet...