4 ms·

Ok just so we're clear... You're arguing that defending a statutory rapist isn't supporting pedophilia BUT working on the guidance systems for an autonomous gr

Ok just so we're clear... You're arguing that defending a statutory rapist isn't supporting pedophilia BUT working on the guidance systems for an autonomous ground vehicle is "help the government kill people"?

lostjohnny 7y ago
> You're arguing that defending a statutory rapist isn't supporting pedophilia Wrong. I'm saying that Stallman never defended a statutory rapist. He tried to defend the protest from the backlash of using the wrong terms and a dead person from an accusation that is hard to prove anyway now that he's dead. Statutory rape is just a safer option given the circumstances. BTW defending a statutory rapist is not supporting pedophilia or any attorney who defended an alleged (there is no official accusation yet) statutory rapist was also supporting pedophilia? > for an autonomous ground vehicle is "help the government kill people"? That's what drones are for... And I've never said that either. I've only said that she works there.