3 ms·
No, it would be about making things safe/usable for the merely competent and not relying on "brilliance".
by stan_rogers 7y ago
No, it would be about making things safe/usable for the merely competent and not relying on "brilliance".
- chrisseaton 7y agoRight, but my point is there may not actually be any pilots who are merely competent at all skills. The distribution of skills may be more complex than that. You may be making things safe for someone who does not exist, which is pointless, and you'd be better off making things safe for something other than a simple mean average.
- inimino 7y agoYou're going off on a tangent based on semantics and speculation. Pilots who are competent at every basic skill, but don't have years of combat or test pilot experience or extensive experience on the plane in question absolutely exist and that's what we're talking about.
- anigbrowl 7y agoYou're getting hung up on this, like looking for the individual in a population who exactly matches an average, while ignoring the normal distribution that surrounds it. Don't obsess over the point, just center your window function around it.