4 ms·
As far as I understand it, user data is still encrypted and the key is protected by the Secure Enclave, which is not affected. This exploit allows flashing uns
by rescbr 7y ago
As far as I understand it, user data is still encrypted and the key is protected by the Secure Enclave, which is not affected.
This exploit allows flashing unsigned firmware, so by stealing the phone the attackers won’t be able to decrypt your data, but an evil maid attack is now (or will be) feasible.
Also, stolen iPhones are now more valuable, as you will be able to bypass iCloud Lock.
- rahkiin 7y agoSo this might increase theft, as it is more valuable than a mere brick now. I hope we get some word from Apple about this.
- mschuster91 7y ago> So this might increase theft, as it is more valuable than a mere brick now. Only for older models, the newest series is not vulnerable.
- oliveshell 7y agoThe vast majority of iPhones currently in use are “older models“ [1]. Only A12 and A13 devices are unaffected (XS/XR, 11). [1]: https://deviceatlas.com/blog/most-popular-iphones https://deviceatlas.com/blog/most-popular-iphones
- btbuilder 7y agoI don’t have deep knowledge of the security architecture here but, in general the key doesn’t need to be compromised to retrieve data in secure systems. What prevents unauthorized firmware from requesting that the Secure Enclave decrypt all data? Similar to having control over an HSM - you can’t extract the key but you can perform cryptographic operations.
- mschuster91 7y agoThe SE will still require a password or other authentication data (e.g. iris/finger print, biometric measurements) until it will use its key to decrypt the data. The only ways around this are: * physical extraction of the embedded memory in the SE (I'm not sure if this is actually feasible, it's certainly a destructive attack) * "updating" the SE firmware - this is what the FBI wanted Apple to do in that terrorism case, that Apple develop a SE firmware that leaks the secret key * exploiting bugs in the SE firmware - this is what the FBI ended up doing by hiring either Cellebrite or some anonymous hackers (depending on which source one believes).
- btbuilder 7y agoI see. Hence evil maid attack. If someone has temporary physical access they could install malware that captures data when the device is unlocked. Chargers as an attack vector seem more likely, if more mundane.
- als0 7y agoIn the case of malicious chargers I believe Apple already authenticates peripherals to make data capture more difficult. If you’re unauthenticated then you will not be able to do much unless explicitly authorised. Of course, none of that matters if you can reflash the device or exploit the boot ROM.
- tgragnato 7y ago> exploiting bugs in the SE firmware / "updating" the SE firmware why not both?
- ehsankia 7y agoSo if I understand, just losing your phone is safe, but if you find it again after losing it, you basically shouldn't keep using the phone before completely reflashing the device?
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoAny modifications won’t survive a reboot (this is a “tethered” exploit), so if you’re concerned just turn the phone off and on again. Honestly, I find the malicious attack scenarios for this pretty far fetched.
- topranks 7y agoWell it won’t come back on in that case (the modified firmware will fail signature check.). But as you say you are still safe, just don’t unlock the device before reboot.
- Wowfunhappy 7y agoI think that depends on how it's set up, right? I rememember on my old iPod Touch with a tethered bootrom exploit, you could reboot without a computer but it would start up in non-Jailbreak mode. If you wanted to boot Jaillbroken, you had to find a computer. (This was the origin of the term "semi-tethered Jailbreak").
- tinus_hn 7y agoAny special abilities you may get disappear on reboot, so this isn’t a very practical activation lock bypass.