4 ms·
I don't see the contradiction here honestly. The only tangible market for a Mac Pro is professional Final Cut users in a professional setting, no? If this is
by headmelted 7y ago
I don't see the contradiction here honestly.
The only tangible market for a Mac Pro is professional Final Cut users in a professional setting, no?
If this is hogwash, tell me so, but it just seems that any other realistic scenario that requires this level of hardware (like research, rendering and AI) would be significantly cheaper and better supported outside of Apple's ecosystem.
Short of having a pretty device to sit in a studio, what other reason is there for this to exist? (And how much of that audience is more likely to just buy iMac Pros).
As regards development - Most development tasks won't significantly benefit from the performance offered here, and anyone who needs that performance is likely going to buy something significantly better value for money (as regards tech specs) than a Mac Pro.
I'm not aware of any significant tools for 3d modelling or video editing (besides FCP) that are OSX-exclusive, and that audience is surely better served by a much cheaper Windows/Linux machine.
- ancientworldnow 7y agoThere aren't any serious edit houses that use FCP X outside of gimmick advertising deals like some late night shows. Everyone is using Avid or increasingly Premiere anyway. In my experience, the past five years have seen a dramatic shift to windows in professional facilities (Oscar winning editors). I do know one very high end editor who cuts on a Mac mini. The old school guys are used to proxy workflows and you don't need lots of power for that anyway.