3 ms·
So let me see if I get your definition of assault right: It doesn't depend at all on alleged attacker's intentions or actions, it doesn't depend on alleged vic
by Hitton 7y ago
So let me see if I get your definition of assault right:
It doesn't depend at all on alleged attacker's intentions or actions, it doesn't depend on alleged victim's actions, only thing that matters is if the alleged victim did it for one motivation (wanted it) or other (didn't want it, was forced to do it by some external factor).
I would say that any reasonable person disagrees with such definition.
- bscphil 7y agoWhere, in this entire thread, do you see me define assault? I don't understand what you're responding to. My claim, through the entire mess this thread has become, was and remains that Stallman said something.
- DSingularity 7y agoMan, I read your entire thread of comments. You are all over the place. Your insistence made me repeat my reading of the RMS email and I think you should just drop this.
- bscphil 7y agoThe email is extremely clear, and in fact I'm not all over the place. I keep repeating myself so much precisely because no one is bothering to respond to the same, repeated point, which has never changed since my first post in this thread. Do you have any dispute with my characterization of RMS's comments? Can you defend any alternative reading to the plain meaning of his statements, as I set them out above?