4 ms·
Great. To me the more interesting question will be how this evidence is handled at trial. DNA matching is a stochastic process. There is no line of logic involv
by madrox 7y ago
Great. To me the more interesting question will be how this evidence is handled at trial. DNA matching is a stochastic process. There is no line of logic involved. Therefore, when using it in court it can only be used in the context of probability of a match. Humans are notoriously bad at assessing probability, and there are some great TED talks out there on how bad we really are and how it’s already affected our non-genetically enhanced justice system. My greatest hope is not that DNA searches are banned, but that we treat DNA matches as circumstantial evidence that may help indicate a suspect but is inadmissible as evidence of guilt.
- peter303 7y agoForensic genealogy being a very new tool has resulted in dozens of arrests, but only one finishing a trial. https://www.wired.com/story/the-first-murder-case-to-use-family-tree-forensics-goes-to-trial/ https://www.wired.com/story/the-first-murder-case-to-use-fam... Like any new forensic method, it will undergo years of legal scrutiny.
- JoeSmithson 7y agoHave I misunderstood or are you saying all DNA evidence should be inadmissible? Like normal matching of samples?