2 ms·
this doesn't really solve the problem, its a little better, however, as it STILL accepts positional arguments you can still get in trouble if you don't use para
by keithnz 7y ago
this doesn't really solve the problem, its a little better, however, as it STILL accepts positional arguments you can still get in trouble if you don't use parameter names.
- alkonaut 7y agoA compile time analyzer that says "always use named parameters when calling functions with similar type of consecuitve arguments" should be pretty easy to write. It would be better to have a foolproof API, but obviously it can't change now.