3 ms·
Well, for one thing, you would need to block out 2% of sunlight to counteract the warming effect that we've seen since the industrial revolution. But more impo
by hannasanarion 7y ago
Well, for one thing, you would need to block out 2% of sunlight to counteract the warming effect that we've seen since the industrial revolution.
But more importantly, you are underestimating the scale. The earth is big, and L1 is far away. A device that blocks 2% of the sunlight at that distance would have to cover 4.5 million square kilometers, a disc that size would be larger than the moon, or about the size of the entire United States including Alaska.
It would also require engines that need to be constantly refueled, because solar wind, which is really strong at the scale we're talking about, would push it away in just a few months.
And the screen would need to be smart, because L1 is only quasi-stable. The actual point where there is zero differential gravity is, well, a point, and any deviation from that point will inevitably increase until the object eventually falls into a regular orbit, so to stay there you need to be constantly monitoring your own orbit and correcting for deviations. Only L4 and L5 are self-correcting (which is why there are no known natural objects at L1-3 of any two-body system)
- zebez 7y agoWould you need a single mirror? Many smaller mirrors sounds more plausible.
- adrianN 7y agoYou'd still need to lift them to L1 and equip them with propellants to counter the solar wind.
- hannasanarion 7y agoThe number of mirrors isn't the problem. No matter how many pieces you slice it into, you have to achieve that quantity of surface area somehow.