3 ms·
I'll take my "realclimatescience" in the form of physical evidence over a significant period (ice cores, growth rings, etc) rather then a few anecdotes about he
by jascii 7y ago
I'll take my "realclimatescience" in the form of physical evidence over a significant period (ice cores, growth rings, etc) rather then a few anecdotes about heat waves (that's weather, not climate). If that's ok?
- solarwind 7y agoWhat about the NOAA data adjustments and climate scientists openly discussing getting rid of the 1940s warmth: https://realclimatescience.com/61-fake-data/ https://realclimatescience.com/61-fake-data/ and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T86IIKK9FRg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T86IIKK9FRg And lack of warming trend in the raw data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mWanx8ojmOkcazzRhDaoHMHyDWxR3PqUP0EdtdIUU84 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mWanx8ojmOkcazzRhDao... And the new USCRN data showing no significant warming trend in the USA in 12 years: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/11/08/the-uscrn-revisited/ https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/11/08/the-uscrn-revisited/ And the Canadian data purge: https://twitter.com/EcoSenseNow/status/1174909654297538560 https://twitter.com/EcoSenseNow/status/1174909654297538560
- jascii 7y agoWhat about what? All I'm seeing is some irrelevant local data over a period that is way too small to say anything useful about climate trends and a few political talking points about isolated incidents..