3 ms·
> “At the end of the day, we’re not the judge and jury to determine whether a crime has occurred,” Tracey Breeden, Uber’s global head of women’s safety, told th
by mabbo 7y ago
> “At the end of the day, we’re not the judge and jury to determine whether a crime has occurred,” Tracey Breeden, Uber’s global head of women’s safety, told the Post. “We’re here to gather information, make a business decision. We’re not law enforcement.”
All the more reason to give what you have to the actual law enforcement and let them determine if a crime has occurred.
They are literally choosing to make more money by allowing crimes to not be prosecuted. How can anyone who is part of this sleep at night?
- throwaway_law 7y agoDon't forget the corporate double-speak: >“We are very proud of this team’s work and know they approach their jobs with tremendous compassion and understanding,” the spokesperson said. “Characterizing this team as anything but providing support to people after a difficult experience is just wrong."
- muro 7y agoA good example how to say nothing in many words.
- chooseaname 7y agoIf they don't turn over what they find, when it would be appropriate for them to do so, then, yes, they are judge and jury. Good grief, this company.