30 ms·
Of course getting vaccinated is the better option. But that's not the question here. The question is whether someone should be forced to be vaccinated. Not
by emmelaich 7y ago
Of course getting vaccinated is the better option.
But that's not the question here. The question is whether someone should be forced to be vaccinated.
Not sure why this concept is so hard to get across.
- echelon 7y agoIf children wish to go to a publicly-funded school and come into close contact with other children, then they should be vaccinated. Period. If you want an exception for your child, then privately educate them. The chilling effect you're seeing on your devil's advocate arguments are because anti-vaxxers have caused so much harm with their pseudoscience. There is no room for playing nice or entertaining a middle ground. The government has stepped in and made public health choices for us already. For instance, we chlorinated and fluoridated the public water supply. If you want to drink bottled water, that's fine. This isn't even a powerful enough analogy though, because vaccination doesn't just impact individuals. Every act of rejection lowers the fitness of the population.
- emmelaich 7y agoechelon, I agree with everything you write here. Which tells me you're still not getting my point.
- michaelmrose 7y agoIt's not that respondents don't understand your position its because as a group we can't afford to accept it. The negative effects of abstaining from vaccination aren't felt merely by the families they are felt by everyone. The 90% can't afford to let the 10% have their own way when it would hurt everyone. In other news you aren't allowed to do all sorts of things on your own property that threaten your neighbors safety.
- emmelaich 7y ago> It's not that respondents don't understand your position .. You're still not getting it. I don't have that position.