It seems like the checklist blurs the lines between a language and standard libraries, something that shouldn’t be controversial but should be noted. The check

It seems like the checklist blurs the lines between a language and standard libraries, something that shouldn’t be controversial but should be noted. The checklist also seems to favor dynamic languages. E.g. does Go deserve to miss a checkmark because you can’t determine if a variable exists at runtime (only at compile time)? I can sorta see the source inclusion checkbox, but it’s not entirely clear from the example if this is testing for a macro support, AOP, or dynamic loading of libraries.