3 ms·
It's good that they can voice their opposition. It's bad to you that they're opposing progress according to your definition of progress. There is a distinction.
by zo1 7y ago
It's good that they can voice their opposition. It's bad to you that they're opposing progress according to your definition of progress. There is a distinction.
The other side of this is that there is an element of obstructionism built into the model of democracy. Too much process, back and forth, judge-intervention, lawsuits, counter-lawsuits, voting and representation, etc. It would be ideal if we simply allowed everyone to vote on it, and go with the majority outcome.
- mc32 7y agoAffording ourselves insight into the cosmos I think is unreservedly progressive. If Paris can move graveyards and cemeteries underground for progress, surely something similar can be arranged to enable progress on the one hand and afford people the ability to honor their ancestors and culture.
- zo1 7y agoOh, don't get me wrong. I fully agree that looking and moving towards the stars is progress we should be working towards and doing so delicately if necessary. There are too many fixable and silly-things happening in the world today that absolutely demolish our ability to progress as a society.