The author either made a dumb mistake, or is being extra clever. H.265 is the in-development successor to H.264. It's probably true that, in the future, WebM's

The author either made a dumb mistake, or is being extra clever. H.265 is the in-development successor to H.264. It's probably true that, in the future, WebM's competition will be H.265, and his whole point is that you should make strategic choices based on future expectations, not just present state of the technology. I am not sure if he meant to make this point in an overly subtle way, or just got the name wrong. Edit: looks like he fixed the post, so he was sloppy, not clever.