3 ms·
He probably meant to write unreasonable. Was what I was trying to point out. But your comment is good too. :-)
by jacobush 7y ago
He probably meant to write unreasonable. Was what I was trying to point out. But your comment is good too. :-)
- cannam 7y agoIt's a slightly ambiguous parse. > we slowly start to see ideas we once would have rejected out of hand as "reasonable" only after... I think you parsed it as > we slowly start to see (ideas we once would have rejected out of hand as "reasonable") only after and concluded that "unreasonable" was intended. But I think the proper parse is > we slowly start to see (ideas we once would have rejected out of hand) as "reasonable" only after
- lostlogin 7y agoA literal reasonable argument. Bizarre how it can work either way - thanks for pointing this out.