4 ms·
It's specified in RFC5233 [0], by "standard" I meant codified in RFC form, like everything else we treat as open internet "standards". [0] https://tools.ietf.o
by newnewpdro 7y ago
It's specified in RFC5233 [0], by "standard" I meant codified in RFC form, like everything else we treat as open internet "standards".
[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5233
- pseudalopex 7y agoRFC 5223 uses + as an example. It doesn't even specify whether the detail part comes before or after the user part.
- hdfbdtbcdg 7y ago> On email systems that allow for 'subaddressing' or 'detailed addressing' (e.g., "ken+sieve@example.org"), This rfc merely acknowledges that some systems do this. It doesn't say the must or even should.