3 ms·
Though experiment: what if the "dissenting opinion" is advocating for human trafficking, with a specialization for children to be sold as sex slaves? Or somethi
by pstuart 7y ago
Though experiment: what if the "dissenting opinion" is advocating for human trafficking, with a specialization for children to be sold as sex slaves? Or something equally awful.
Does the business have the right to refuse to service a customer that society should rightly condemn?
- nbabitskiy 7y agoI live in a city with population of about 15 million people, and for some time we had bakeries, claiming in print that they wouldn't serve f###### (anti-gay slur). Not sure if they're still around, but quite sure I don't like letting businesses discriminate whomever they'd like to.
- StanislavPetrov 7y agoA private business should have the right to refuse service for any reason they choose. I believe the point the original OP was trying to make is that a business should be transparent about its willingness to refuse service to those they find, "socially awful".
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- frittig 7y agoThen the business could say that they don't serve people who advocate for illegal activity. If they also don't want to serve dinner people who advocate for legal activity, then they should be transparent about it