3 ms·
I'm not sure which of these two points you're trying to make: 1) These specific counties could be flukes because of their small population. We can account for
by rovolo 7y ago
I'm not sure which of these two points you're trying to make:
1) These specific counties could be flukes because of their small population.
We can account for that by making multiple observations--i.e. look at multiple years of data--and seeing if the counties change rank. The visualization has yearly data for 1980-2014, and the specified counties are consistently high compared to the national average
https://vizhub.healthdata.org/subnational/usa https://vizhub.healthdata.org/subnational/usa
2) The 'rural' component of these counties isn't necessarily a factor, since the counties with lowest rates may be rural as well.
A bit of searching turns up a clear correlation between population density and suicide:
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/How-population-density-affects-suicide-rates-in-the-United-States-1989-1998-The-death_fig6_240918084 https://www.researchgate.net/figure/How-population-density-a...
- koonsolo 7y agoI was trying to make point 1, but you definitely showed this is not the case. That last graph is a really nice one, as it shows more variance on low populations, but on average still way higher than on high populations. Thanks for the clarification! :)