4 ms·
I'm not sure. Going by the Apple example, they refused to create new code to do something they were not in the past. That limit made the courts agree with them
by tomschlick 7y ago
I'm not sure.
Going by the Apple example, they refused to create new code to do something they were not in the past. That limit made the courts agree with them that they could not be compelled to create something new.
Yahoo / ISPs already have the data so they have to comply with the law by providing that data upon request.
- throw0101a 7y ago> Yahoo / ISPs already have the data so they have to comply with the law by providing that data upon request. Data is being sent to CF: can they be forced to raise the logging level from "INFO" to "DEBUG"? See also Lavabit: > Lavabit is an open-source encrypted webmail service, founded in 2004. The service suspended its operations on August 8, 2013 after the U.S. Federal Government ordered it to turn over its Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) private keys, in order to allow the government to spy on Edward Snowden's email.[2][3][4][5] * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit
- jachee 7y agoI imagine that at its scale, CF could legitimately claim technical limitations prevent them from collecting data at the volume of traffic that 1.1.1.1 gets.
- nickpsecurity 7y agoWith NSA's expert testimony, the FBI could legitimately claim that was BS and provide collection hardware to "assist" them. ;)