3 ms·
The distinction here would probably be with how state DMVs do things like 'only open every fifth Wednesday' (https://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/201
by crooked-v 7y ago
The distinction here would probably be with how state DMVs do things like 'only open every fifth Wednesday' (https://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2016/feb/19/john-oliver/office-provides-id-voting-one-wisconsin-burg-open-/ https://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2016/feb/19/...).
- SilasX 7y agoYes, I understand the concept of "that government office is a pain to deal with", but that concept is not conveyed by calling it "no DMV".
- parsimo2010 7y agoSorry, the distinction was supposed to be that state level DMVs can't securely verify someone's identity. Although they are often frustrating to deal with, it's the issue with fragmented administration that's the real problem with a DMV- each state decides the burden of proof before they give out an official "government issued ID" and most states are very lax- there is no way the DMV is Nevada is going to call up a county records office in Georgia to verify someone's birth information. A national system would be better at verifying identities.