2 ms·
Fair enough. But let's not add into the mix a single company that spans the whole world yet is headquartered in a single country.
by mwcampbell 7y ago
Fair enough. But let's not add into the mix a single company that spans the whole world yet is headquartered in a single country.
- IOT_Apprentice 7y agoI'm not sure how being headquartered in 2, 20 or 200 countries is going to make a difference, can you please explain? At most, those would be satellite or region offices, which in the end will report to a central HQ.
- laughinghan 7y agoI think it's extremely clear that mwcampbell is pointing to being 'headquartered in a single country' as one of the aspects they don't like about a single company having too much power. It's clear they're not advocating more headquarters for companies with too much power, they're advocating more companies each with less power.
- gzer0 7y ago> yet is headquartered in a single country. The vast majority of companies have their HQ in a single country. This is due to the base function that the HQ serves for a corporation. [0][1] [0]http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporate-headquarters.asp http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporate-headquarters.a... [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_headquarters#Locations_of_corporate_headquarters https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_headquarters#Locatio...