I agree with your post that "victims are at a disadvantage", but you say that: > there is rarely any evidence while also saying that: > Most accusations are

I agree with your post that "victims are at a disadvantage", but you say that: > there is rarely any evidence while also saying that: > Most accusations are real This feels like a contradiction. We can only know whether an accusation is real or not when there is enough evidence. I think that doing extrapolation exercises based on no evidence is a bad idea.