9 ms·
Well good it's not fundamental "right" (you have no rights to other people's brains) - but courts should not accept what was written 10 years ago as evidence fo
by buboard 7y ago
Well good it's not fundamental "right" (you have no rights to other people's brains) - but courts should not accept what was written 10 years ago as evidence for or against someone's character.
- eridan2 7y agowhy not? if he did something bad 10 years ago and he did again one month ago, is says something about his character.
- esarbe 7y agogp wrote: >but courts should not accept what was written 10 years ago as evidence for or against someone's character. you wrote: >he did again one month ago ...