I would say that you're barking up the wrong tree. It's really about cost of investment vs return on investment. 15 tonne robots still cost too much to build, t

I would say that you're barking up the wrong tree. It's really about cost of investment vs return on investment. 15 tonne robots still cost too much to build, transport, run, etc. Therefore, they have no competitors, because everybody else did the same napkin math but realized it wouldn't work. That's not to say that something like this isn't possible, the size simply needs to be reduced. Remove the human from the inside and then your robots can also deal proper blows.