3 ms·
That was an interesting read. It would seem that Roscosmos has more incentive to re-use booster stages than Tesla does, both from a cost savings and a future cl
by ChuckMcM 7y ago
That was an interesting read. It would seem that Roscosmos has more incentive to re-use booster stages than Tesla does, both from a cost savings and a future cleanup problem savings.
For some reason I find the idea of a chicken coop with a (possibly) titanium metal roof fairly amusing.
- mc32 7y agoThe Russians haven’t yet shed their Soviet ways -in many respects and consciousness with respect to the environment is one of them. It’s not a big concern. They don’t care much about it. The aftermath of hypersonic rocket/missile accident in the Arctic is a good example of their disregard in that area.
- juskrey 7y agoThat "Soviet way" is there for many centuries already..
- cpursley 7y agoI can confirm (I live in Russia for part of the year). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tragedy_of_the_commons
- growlist 7y agoThey have so much land - perhaps it gives a different perspective.
- growlist 7y agoAbout 20 years ago in the early days of the web I used to browse websites about nuclear accidents and the like. Needless to say lots of these have disappeared or changed since, and I think some interesting material is probably lost. One of the stories I read concerned two Russian sailors attempting to steal expensive metals from a nuclear device (which thankfully had had the physics package removed). As I recall the story the device was resistant to their attempts at deconstruction, which led to them escalating to employment of a hammer, which led to rapid atomisation of the sailors after the high explosive trigger was activated.
- pacetherace 7y agoActually, the biggest incentive for SpaceX to reuse the parts was to bring down the costs to compete with the incumbents on pricing after factoring in their R&D costs. The older launch vehicles and their payloads are pretty much standardized. The have little incentive to improve.