Your thesis presumes some democratic mechanism, as juries ultimately are. Unfortunately, an increasing number of the laws we are subjected to in the United Sta

Your thesis presumes some democratic mechanism, as juries ultimately are. Unfortunately, an increasing number of the laws we are subjected to in the United States are bureaucratic edicts removed several levels from democratic checks and balances. It appears to me that these are more readily steered by lobbying groups -- which by their nature agglomerate polarized supporters. How else can you explain this Title IX perversity?