3 ms·
> Same with both Linux and windows. Could you clarify how this is the case on Windows? I thought Google Chrome installs and runs just fine without admin privil
by mehrdadn 7y ago
> Same with both Linux and windows.
Could you clarify how this is the case on Windows? I thought Google Chrome installs and runs just fine without admin privileges. I'm not aware of any security downsides for doing so.
- judge2020 7y agoMaybe it's possible but the current installer has windows pop up a UAC prompt before it continues.
- mehrdadn 7y agoThat's just because it wants to install machine-wide if possible. You can just tell it to continue without admin permissions and it tells you explicitly that it can be installed without that. Note that Windows doesn't work like Linux with setuid bits and whatnot. The permissions a file is installed with don't dictate what permissions the program that executes it has. That's entirely a function of the program's security context. Hence, for a machine-wide installation to actually make a difference security-wise, Google would actually have to install e.g. a high-privilege service that would run when you try to start Chrome. I don't think it does such a thing. So I think Windows is already designed correctly in this regard and hence I don't think this is an issue on Windows as claimed.