3 ms·

Yes, before the cash rebate it was ~£350M/week (or £376M/week according to this). Which boris used without accounting for the rebate which would have brought it

Yes, before the cash rebate it was ~£350M/week (or £376M/week according to this). Which boris used without accounting for the rebate which would have brought it down to considerably less. He lied and you seem ok with it. > Yes. However having a second referendum is spectacularly dangerous and undemocratic as you've already read So Yes, people can change their mind, you allow, but no they shouldn't have a 2nd vote, you say, despite the fact they may have changed their mind. So what am I supposed to conclude from that? IMO it's problematic either way, but if we had a 2nd referendum at least "the will of the people" would be clearer. Which may give us a way forwards, which I proposed as a compromise, but you are trying to shut down. Your compromise/way forward is... what?

nailer 7y ago
I mentioned why the EU having control of our money is bad in a previous post you responded to and didn't read. There is no compromise. We lost. Asking people to vote a second time before disrespects the first referendum. I have explained this a fourth time. I'm blocking you now. You'll say it's because you're making amazing points, but actually it's because you're talking to yourself.
- tempguy9999 7y ago
  > I mentioned why the EU having control of our money is bad in a previous post and I responded "True but irrelevant. Boris lied". > Asking people to vote a second time before disrespects the first referendum "Good evening madam, please be seated" "Thank you. Let's see, I think I'll have the fish... no wait, the chicken looks good. I'll have the chick-" "NO! You will have the fish" "But I want the ch-" "Do not do this! You wanted the fish and you will have the fish" "But I changed my m-" "You are disrespecting your first choice and I cannot allow this!" Well, that's not how I see things.
  - nailer 7y ago
    > > "The ONS figures for 2015 suggest the UK’s gross contribution to the EU, before the cash rebate received by the UK, totalled £19.6 billion – or about £376 million a week. " > "True but irrelevant. Boris lied". I mentioned you were having a discussion with yourself earlier, but thanks for providing an example. "Fish is better" "I'll have the chick-" Person A shits all over chicken before it arrives "Hah fish is better don't you want fish now?"

nailer 7y ago

I mentioned why the EU having control of our money is bad in a previous post you responded to and didn't read. There is no compromise. We lost. Asking people to vote a second time before disrespects the first referendum. I have explained this a fourth time. I'm blocking you now. You'll say it's because you're making amazing points, but actually it's because you're talking to yourself.

tempguy9999 7y ago
> I mentioned why the EU having control of our money is bad in a previous post and I responded "True but irrelevant. Boris lied". > Asking people to vote a second time before disrespects the first referendum "Good evening madam, please be seated" "Thank you. Let's see, I think I'll have the fish... no wait, the chicken looks good. I'll have the chick-" "NO! You will have the fish" "But I want the ch-" "Do not do this! You wanted the fish and you will have the fish" "But I changed my m-" "You are disrespecting your first choice and I cannot allow this!" Well, that's not how I see things.
- nailer 7y ago
  > > "The ONS figures for 2015 suggest the UK’s gross contribution to the EU, before the cash rebate received by the UK, totalled £19.6 billion – or about £376 million a week. " > "True but irrelevant. Boris lied". I mentioned you were having a discussion with yourself earlier, but thanks for providing an example. "Fish is better" "I'll have the chick-" Person A shits all over chicken before it arrives "Hah fish is better don't you want fish now?"