Not defending the law, but yes, at the moment where Google is hosting that information, it has effectively become another source and seems fair to treat them th

Not defending the law, but yes, at the moment where Google is hosting that information, it has effectively become another source and seems fair to treat them the same as a source. They could get out of it by not being a source. Say you search "John Doe crimes". Consider these Google results: 1) <some url> 2) <some url> John Doe was accused of kicking a baby in Brussels... In case 1) Google is just pointing you to a url and isn't a source. In case 2), Google is hosting some of the content itself and has become a source. So any law that says "if you have the story about John Doe kicking the baby, remove it", then it should apply to the summary Google gives in 2.