You have a point that radio ads are less hostile and invasive than more targeted advertisement, but that argument feels a bit like "It's less defensible to resi

You have a point that radio ads are less hostile and invasive than more targeted advertisement, but that argument feels a bit like "It's less defensible to resist a stabbing, because it's better than getting shot" Resisting psychological manipulation by entities that don't want the best for you remains highly defensible. Media creators want what's best for the hand that feeds them. Both advertisers and mediums that host advertisements are subjecting me to messages that are intentionally designed to influence my behavior, often in ways that 1) I did not ask for, and would not elect given a choice 2) are misleading 3) are interruptive or otherwise undermine the utility of whatever I'm watching/listening to. There's a similar justification/motive outlined on the main site https://www.adblockradio.com/en/ https://www.adblockradio.com/en/