I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make. Both losing it at the same time does not say anything about the value? Devil's advocate: The journ

I am not sure I understand the point you are trying to make. Both losing it at the same time does not say anything about the value? Devil's advocate: The journalist loses his job and livelihood. I had nothing to say anyways. Clearly to him it had much more value. I obviously agree that free speech is valuable for everyone (and so is free software), but how do you best explain why?