> She doesn't matter, and any attack on her will be seen as petty at best by those who only read the articles. I don't care about being being popular. And I d

> She doesn't matter, and any attack on her will be seen as petty at best by those who only read the articles. I don't care about being being popular. And I don't even care of being judged by internet nobodys, I'm over 40, I've grown some skin for teenager's shitty destructive behaviour. I care about not covering facts. She'll be paying for what she did in the future. That's for sure, I would never trust at my job someone who leaks information like some sort of enemy spy. Stallman has a reputation, she doesn't. Alan Turing was incarcerated for being gay, after all he did for his country. At least Stallman roams free (for now). But I've canceled my yearly donation to FSF and I encourage everyone I know to do the same. It was (physically) a drop in the ocean to help them doing the right thing, not what is popular at the moment. And I did it despite disagreeing with Stallman on different points, I knew it was for a good cause, now I don't care if they burn in hell, they're just like Google or Apple to me. If they can't defend their most honorable member, they can't defend anybody. If they prefer to be on the side of those building killing machines, it's their right. But they've become useless. If they had some self respect, they would shutdown the FSF for good. > Any effort expended on her could have been expended on dispelled one of the falsehoods being propagated about rms. I did it on several occasions. And I'll keep doing it. The two things are not at odds, I can do both.