4 ms·
Love it. I've used Catalyst for some project, but I've now been looking at Mojo and I like the look of it. Haven't used it much yes so I can't comment on detail
by ZeroMinx 16y ago
Love it. I've used Catalyst for some project, but I've now been looking at Mojo and I like the look of it. Haven't used it much yes so I can't comment on details, but it looks solid
- und3f 16y agoCatalyst applications are very heavy, but i didn't found any problems in running catalyst application that i wrote year ago on latest Catalyst version. Mojolicious is lightweight and easier to install, but its design is still under development, so API changes sometimes. Expect there will be not so much changes in new stable versions.
- ZeroMinx 16y agoDon't get me wrong, I think Catalyst is great. But I liked the look of Mojo (and Mojo::Lite) -- as I said I haven't used it much but I'll try to use it in a project soon -- I also think it's good for Perl as a whole that there's an easy to install / easy to use modern framework.