> it's clear that army units were sent in and simply murdered a large number of people who were carrying out an unarmed protest Which is utterly puzzling becau

> it's clear that army units were sent in and simply murdered a large number of people who were carrying out an unarmed protest Which is utterly puzzling because the technique of priming the slaughter with agents provocateurs amongst the protesters is neither new nor particularly difficult. Were the leaders involved just incredibly incompetent at tyranny or was there something else going on?